changeset 296:87f83879cecb cleanup-3

Possible bugfix: do not use bitwise and (&) This fixes a possible bug. A bitwise and (&) was used instead of the intended boolean and (&&). I found this while code reading, and I'm not aware of any user visible bug related to this, but it feels wrong and possibly dangerous to use this construct here. Signed-off-by: Jan Mulder <jlmulder@xs4all.nl>
author Jan Mulder <jlmulder@xs4all.nl>
date Thu, 16 May 2019 08:54:33 +0200
parents 718e5feded62
children 87d54b4fd946
files Discovery/Src/gfx_engine.c
diffstat 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) [+]
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/Discovery/Src/gfx_engine.c	Mon May 13 13:37:34 2019 +0000
+++ b/Discovery/Src/gfx_engine.c	Thu May 16 08:54:33 2019 +0200
@@ -1575,7 +1575,7 @@
 		dataMax++;
 	dataDelta =  (unsigned long)(dataMax - dataMin);
 	dataDeltaHalve = dataDelta / 2;
-	while((w1 <= windowwidth) & (w2 < datalength))
+	while((w1 <= windowwidth) && (w2 < datalength))
 	{
 		int tmp = (10 * w1 * (long)datalength)/windowwidth;
 		w2 = tmp/10;