Mercurial > public > ostc4
comparison Discovery/Src/base.c @ 223:5f535ef6a3db div-fixes-3
Bugfix, minor: properly alternate VPM/Buhlmann in deco loop
The idea of the counter in this commit is to compute the opposite
deco algorithm in 1:10 calls. So, when Buhlmann is selected,
also compute VPM with 1:10 sample rate (and vise versa).
The idea is good, but this never worked as the counter was local on
the stack, so was 0 for every call here. So, when switching between
deco algorithm, it took some refresh cycles as the computations
where not in sync.
Signed-off-by: Jan Mulder <jlmulder@xs4all.nl>
| author | Jan Mulder <jlmulder@xs4all.nl> |
|---|---|
| date | Sun, 31 Mar 2019 15:14:06 +0200 |
| parents | ce05c801b002 |
| children | 2bb1db22b5f5 |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
| 222:9b4b3decd9ba | 223:5f535ef6a3db |
|---|---|
| 1667 CALC_BUEHLMANN_FUTURE, | 1667 CALC_BUEHLMANN_FUTURE, |
| 1668 CALC_INVALID | 1668 CALC_INVALID |
| 1669 } CALC_WHAT; | 1669 } CALC_WHAT; |
| 1670 | 1670 |
| 1671 static CALC_WHAT what = CALC_INVALID; | 1671 static CALC_WHAT what = CALC_INVALID; |
| 1672 int counter = 0; | 1672 static int counter = 0; |
| 1673 if((stateUsed->mode != MODE_DIVE) || (stateUsed->diveSettings.diveMode == DIVEMODE_Apnea) || (decoLock != DECO_CALC_ready )) | 1673 if((stateUsed->mode != MODE_DIVE) || (stateUsed->diveSettings.diveMode == DIVEMODE_Apnea) || (decoLock != DECO_CALC_ready )) |
| 1674 return; | 1674 return; |
| 1675 | 1675 |
| 1676 decoLock = DECO_CALC_running; | 1676 decoLock = DECO_CALC_running; |
| 1677 | 1677 |